To evaluate maturity, according to a life, principles applied may spare change, or allow distinction, without difference, so to then exact control over trending supply and demand.  A rule of thumb, in application of method, is to embed stance.  Your position on an issue of maturation, as determined by interest in philosophies of consumerism, is money.  Not money in your pocket, but money-compounded according to interest or profit.  This philosophy, one would think, intimates ROI; a fact-based continuum of thought described as: 'return on Investment' through 'return on Interest' ... so, this writing, is to establish an intention toward a population of consumers, in order to create desire, speed economic recovery, and develop curiosity for improved behaviors of established betterment. 

Return on Investment, is to top out at your determined financial burden.  You cash out, at the point of maturation of such invested value, once you've reached your reward.  A stance, according to return on investment, is one of interest being equal, to an amount.  So, once the amount is realized, if it is realized, your investment is re-negotiable, or it is removed, leaving nothing in its place.  An alternate economic position, is to establish a stance according to return on interest, however, which allows prosperous opportunity, or growth according to option.

A Return on Interest, is a community of profit toward an abundance of reward.  Your moral and ethical compass, is a green guidance system.  You take a stand on issues, and decide improved communities of interest, making valuable contribution to any effort, and return of profit, by way of gathered compensation.  As commercial developers of real estate, brokerage is elemental.  A broker should listen:  hearing what's meant, not what's said.  A broker should enlighten:  acting as philosophical intuitive, toward an understanding of an investor, not his cash.  A broker should accord:  find agreement, with communi-centric focus; the investor, as pinnacle of objective; the developer, as pinnacle of achievement; legal recourse, as contracted, albeit customized, definition.  As commercial real estate professionals, our obligation, is to community, is to idea of the project, and is delivered as distinction, with the structure, as concrete evidence.  The establishment of on-going prosperous advantage for, and maintenance of, which should be obvious, and which should be eligible endorsement, of maturity and goal-oriented success, for the broker, forevermore.  One should look to current performance of a structure, and its surrounding financial community, in order to determine eligibility for a broker's professional ability.

"Our brightest hopes are met, with our clearest of intention…"  ....  my epiphany,  'star qualities, reward excellence'  ...

Star qualities, decide a bright future.

  

What if, there was a solution for banks, in which each had an organization or method approach to customization of accounts per customer; so that, each customer had one card for all their needs, whether it be debit, credit, access to a larger loan community for large purchases, if their creditworthiness was enabled? 

And, what if ‘enabled’ meant that the banking community had a hierarchy associated with stability, literacy (computer, speech, written word, all segregated and understood by the industry, and each particular bank, separately, in order to maintain privacy, etc.); and this, as the literate delineated customer (or business) signature, allowed the customer (or business) ‘points’ which then delegates authority-based purchase transfer (c/b similar to 1031 exchange, in real estate, so that government taxation is a benefit to the business structure and to government programs via banking, etc.)… these points and authority levels, would be something similar to Technorati, only not defined as ranks, but levels, & such authority, then would allow for manipulation of business-level, profession-based, trade?  This could be dictated through every level of customer interest, and allow for safety and security, and for “social work” to be actual work for lower income levels, leading everyone to a personally defined lifestyle choice.. .  I believe one would naturally gravitate to a serviceable comfort level, and respectable knowledge base, whilst maintaining lifestyle according to need.

So, in other words, actual dollars don’t exchange hands (true green, or going green in banking would = no green in currency)...  Dollars still in active play, but as a true social whim… making them fun, not mandatory.  Currency could be your bonus programs, your little extra, your allowance, whatever a lifestyle choice decides, but all life necessities are guaranteed (at the level of a person’s or family’s or business’ ability/practicality/understanding, etc.) through the working system, according to work ethic, according to work philosophy, according to responsible behavior, according to intelligence, according to health, and according to need.

That’s what I was thinking.

  

What has legal ramification, eligibility to, and conciliatory possibility?  The asterisk:  it's the conundrum of the journalists' toolbox.  We "decry" valuable service, through implied, if not applied, worthlessness.

Here, we'll review case in point, and the implications of usage of the asterisk, according to legal prescription, leading to usage across all technical and analytical writings.  The following definition of terms, according to letter formula, is a very rudimentary delivery… but, an exact formula for usage, nonetheless.

Asterisk:  A very defined presumption of possibility, according to guilt “the risk, as implied, or applied, according to disinterest."

An asterisk, appears as a whisper, and is used as the silent or unspoken warning to the reader, in any work in which it appears; it is visual permanence, by value and by time, and decides a corresponding value according to defiance.  One may or may not defy relevance; however, an asterisk's value is realized upon adherence to the document upon, or writing in which, it appears, regardless of relevance, and regardless of behavior of legal relevance, or simply through definition of the terms of such asterisk… so, this is the foundation of all legal presumption, the asterisk-implied, if not applied, is sought as all legal remedy.

It is my assertion, that an asterisk, is legal impudence.  All legal recourse presumes the adherence of the asterisk, whether it exists on paper, or in reality, or whether it is, in fact, realized through some legal awareness, by the civilian, or legally illiterate citizen, or not.  

It is also my assertion, that, now, since the asterisk is in common usage, and since all possibility for deviance of contract or eligibility quality, cannot be ascertained and belied, such asterisk, any asterisk, implied or applied, is void.  (This being qualified and defined here, since all legal proceedings, are registered and brought to jurisdiction, according to case study, applied, and all case study may be reviewed according to all relevance… so, any loophole is easily surrendered, or won, through a basic understanding of relevance.)  Also, the asterisk, according to consumerism, is negate, since “caveat emptor” is discord; it cannot be applied, according to our judicial system, technically, and is easily manipulated through a basic understanding of American History, and legal case study. 

Star Qualities, reduced to succession (***) … these may be distinguished, as by quote, or by recitation of authority.  This being the asterisk, in use as ‘cite'.

Caveat Emptor:  This, is the asterisk used as qualification of a risk, or many instances of a dangerous presumption of  guilt (in multiplicitous usage).

"What happens if," in the response to ‘possibility of’: the asterisk in use as attent toward a notion (the Loyalty Asterisk™).

The Loyalty Asterisk™, in my opinion, should be presumed a lure, by default.  It assumes no risk, and provokes suspended interest… “we hope you’ll buy, we respect your guarded vigilance in defining the worth of this offer; however, we are not financially equipped to assume all risk” … with the prescribed over-use of the asterisk, implied, and applied, the Loyalty Asterisk™ is, defined herein, an expression of the philosophy of “buyer beware”… which doesn’t technically, exist, according to implied usage of the asterisk across the American Judicial System.  The good news here, is that a true marketer, toward a loyalty perspective, is at least providing a red flag of concern.

A flawless remedy retained through social responsibility and PR, according to the avoidance of all legal action, is in the prescribed diligence it takes to understand your business concern, to apply your marketing, ONLY, to your market, and to decide culpability, as a responsible behavior, when and where applicable, to resource.  We work and deal, only with those having equivalent moral and ethical value, disallowing for confusion, through legally bound contractual permanence.  All business matters, then, should be protected and assured gainful economic gratification, without the threat of concern, as can and should be delivered and legally adhered, through the customized prescription of bound contractual definition.  This, through the constant, and ironclad correctness of APPLIED star quality. 

An asterisk is implied behavior; so, if the risk is not applied... loyalty assumes no risk, and effort is value-decreed.

Conundrum to clarity, in one fell swoop.

Politics

  

First, there is continuity and continuum, through mathematic principles, defined. 

This is, as a precursor toward understanding a specific continuum of relevance, beginning at the point of Gathering Estimation:  So, to think of a (one) continuum, as being an object out in the space of your mind, but outside of yourself.  A horizontal line of thought, as a focus.  You can see it, at a distance; as opposed to continuity of thought.  Continuity being where you stand (with your physical presence as the main point) on a particular issue, then looking to other points of value along a line of thinking, as possibly credible, but differing opinion. 

A continuum being fact-based, along a particular ‘line’ of thinking, and has relevance all along the way toward a valid counterpoint or theoretical point of opposition, as opposition to that starting point, at the opposite end of this continuum of thought.

In other words, a Continuum of thought, is outside of yourself, but within your system of values; it's an equation of fact-based thought, with beginning and end. 

A thought according to continuity, starts at perspective, your own, with trajectory from where you sit.

continua strategem:   These are theories of opposition and relevance, of which have point v. point relationship.

a (one) continuum:   An equation of thought within the strategem, which has complete point to point relevance, and then point v. point irrelevance, all along the way; however, does not rely upon rote theory, or consecutive ordered placement (as with consecutive numbers, for example).

to continue:   The process by which all matter makes progress, moves forward, tracks toward, & is directed:  to continue, ‘exhibits’ trajectory, and may be continuous, forever, or, alternatively, may veer, or be re-directed, & possibly mis-directed, by alternative thought or matter.

Continuous thought, is applicable as a direction for one’s life or existence.

A continuum establishes foundation through valid equation, using fact-based elements for proof … tactile evidence.  Time, may work within your equation; however, time is not defined by absolute function, although, time could be a distinct possibility through variable.

So, this line of thinking according to continuum, allows for a system to benefit all people, and for all people to work within the system… fate, then, is dictated on a personal level.

continuum v. perspective … constancy v. conditioned … a constant v. continuity …


Ready?

This writing, which follows, is a theory of relevance:  a continuum for review, which has specific economic relevance/ramification toward American “way of life” and lifestyle stability:

Heretofore:  Gathering Estimation v. Estimated Guess:  A Theory to oppose trend.

Gathering Estimation … is to repair amounts based upon qualified attitudes, and then adjustments according to a theory of ‘more or less’ (as mathematic certainty and absolute fact, not, an estimated ‘guess’).  So, this continuum of understanding, is on a ‘gathering estimation’ v. estimated guess, or, ‘guesstimation’ … plane.
 
A “plane” as defined within this scope of continua, is spectrum:  establishes point relevance and idea within a framework of direct association.  Each point “touching” the next, on a level surface of thought. 

So, that said,

Gathering Estimation, is specific, only, to vertical-frame review, never straight-line calc, and, is supported by fact … it is visual feedback, which is initially experiential (this formula for review, is valid along the entire stretch of the continuum:   “GE v. EG (gu)”).

FYI, this is not to say, that our current economy is built upon “guesswork” but instead, is built upon our qualified “right”… to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; however, the unfortunate reality, is such that this “right” since having never been qualified, has never been put to specific definition.  Therefore, it has been ‘termed’ toward legal definition, allowing all rights to trend.  While these terms should have no clear definition, in order to allow for all positive ways of survival according to health, and happiness, specifics should have been laid to work, to the extent that our country should provide clear paths for growth, prosperity, health, and wealth, according to any eligible purpose for a life, with absolute guidance (a system of orderly possibility for livelihood), and also security, and protection from harm as being natural facts, not ‘rights’; this being the only way to ensure our prescribed ‘inalienable’ rights, accordingly.
 
So, that said, a new economy built upon this continuum of gathering estimation v. estimated guess, does not negate guesswork, but instead, puts it to work and to good use, through fact-based understanding:

The strategy, defined:

To estimate, is a calculated, visual quantification, rendered through experience.  Once applied & verified (via rote math), we then acquire ‘remainder’ feedback (feedback by extra, or ‘assumed’ (meaning garnered).  This being an equivalency to borrowed, as in an understanding of addition/subtraction equations, as when borrowing from, or adding to, a higher place value (the ‘extra’ in question, is in direct equivalence when added, but amassed proportionately and abundantly, by alternative algorithm when reintroduced, as from a negative position of being unaware of actual quantity within mass, the “verified amount”).  So, to gather estimation, is to capture qualified extra proportion (proportion, being a KEY term, not portion, but IS PROPORTIONATE TO, and proportionate in greater abundance, when calculating in arrears (see: pro v. con).  So, to then ‘set aside’ these leftover amounts, pro &/or con, for purposes of bundling, &, to then put to good use.  This does work in both positive & negative (pro&con) verified estimation amounts, to benefit of both.  This would appropriate an acquisition through “torrent” or “deluge” as in a flood of ‘valid concern or interest’ which, in this case, is currency.  This relevance according to idea, is the only reason, we are even able, to estimate through visual acuity!  So, this being a philosophy for an economy; ie, a new economic guide used to capture, and retain, and restore, value, within the American economic system, and is, in greatest opposition to trending supply and demand (which is an economic burden & an environmental backlash, since it is always based upon excess, to the point of burden, at some point).

This idea could, should, & if allowed to exist and is managed, WILL, serve to regulate certain areas and/or sectors of the US economy, as a measure of activity toward industries according to presumption/adherence, and as opposed to trend (since trending, as an economic ‘current,’ is an uncontrollable and unmanaged value) … so,

The point, is that all positive AND negative growth, is excess upon retention, and so can, AND SHOULD, be eligible “rally” for the economy.  This idea, has its foundation, in the ability to estimate a given quantity of items (amounts) in a specified multi-dimensional space, through ‘guesstimation’ which is a learned skill through experience.  To take the process further, is to then actualize verified amounts.  Once determined & revealed, a verified amount is either less than, or more, than one’s perception (the estimated amount), which allows the actualized quantity to “grow” once verified (if the verified amount is less than one’s perception, there is in fact more; if one’s perception was less, one can perceive the difference into being, through acquired transition from other verifiable, & then verified, equivalent spaces).  This given space, as denoted by example above, was only one verified space, so isn’t actualized through GE, since it is only one individual concern; however, once all similar spaces have been qualified, and made equivalent through verifiable and verified example (equivalency = proportion), one will have Gathered Estimation.

The product of Gathered Estimation, is also a useful budgeting tool within any singular industry.  Some may liken it to the quick fix some entities employ:  To the “borrow from Peter, to pay Paul” effort, which only serves to escalate a situation, sooner, rather than later, since it does not consider equivalency.  It only remedies to a slow-drip, a full-blown drain on a budget weakness.  Since it is merely a one-time, one to one, & one-way, (exchange) of value, toward a singular particular or pathway, and doesn't address actualized relief.  Gathered estimation, allows for growth, prosperity, philanthropy, etc., all according to verifiable fact.  The relationship according to opposition along this continuum, of GE to EG, is the process of verification, & a tactile understanding of equivalency.

Gathering Estimation should be used to prohibit inflation.  It can, and hopefully will, be used as ‘waste-save’ or, to re-use a very useful economic term, “reduce, reuse, recycle” toward the established foundation of an alter-economic ego; not a paradigm shift, but a NEW paradigm.  This being as an economy, of customized standards of quality, and preservation. 

A tall drink of water for our dry economic terrain:  The Gathering Estimation Constant, and the Theory of “The Glass Half-Full, a trend-less economy."

Thirsty?

  

"a rose by any other name would smell as sweet”:  this is poetic reason, given by GOD, its meaning?

It means this:  (the rose is thought) is diversity, the means by which a thought is acquired, is scientific process; compare and contrast, one to another … this is thought negotiation, this is an internal system we may use, which then leads us …

to collaboration of efforts … a meeting of the minds, and finds clarity of purpose through mutual understanding ... and,

“when two, are gathered in His name” …

and His name, by any other, would smell this sweet.

God, One God, Father Almighty… maker of Heaven and Earth, of All That Is …

Seen and Unseen, God Is, (this is clarity of purpose, this is color… clear to saturated color)

God Is …

Clarity in color, living color, and life everlasting…

God Is …

Diversity of thought; God makes up the difference,
GOD, is the space between need and desire;

God Is …

And God Decides… GOD Reasons,

God Is …

Greatest To Most … All Things, and All Things GOOD …

God Is …

Alpha, the first, there is no last… world without end… and on and on …

God Is …

and Loves…
lisa

God Is …

The senses:  Sight, Sound, God Is THIS, and then ‘to feel’… this is the greatest of all,

“And The Greatest of These Is GOD” …

our feelings arise when ‘touched’ by emotion… feelings which arise through response:  

GOD is in the response, what can you “feel” when touched by GOD …

God Is… and

GOD does …


writing and poetry


Happy Sunday.

  

Rules, not fashioned, aren't broken

Revisiting epiphanies today, I happened upon another.  Does revelation, have greater truth, and stability of purpose, if founded through methods of emphatic understanding:  Do you 'connect dots' as your method for organization of your thoughts?

This was discovered, as I pondered difference; people tend to relate images, according to a point to point ascent through relevant, comparable thought; either, a pulling forward of information, in its entirety, or a leaping from thought to relevant thought.  I employ alternative remedy, and store thought through resemblance; not making connections, but negotiating (as in, maneuvering through) principles of thought, a method akin to remembrance:  All activity, past and present, is relative.  Past activity, is personal experience; personal experience, draws upon strength of character, in building a platform for higher-level processing.  So, thoughts remembered, have attribute, each one having potential for resemblance to any and all real-life and current situation; therefore, each may spark recall, for innovation of thought. 

To recall through resemblance persuades effort; so, allows attention to draw ribbons of truth according to an understanding of historic related events, or similar principles collected as a result, of such events.  This is the idiom, "hindsight, is 20/20" ...  not a pining for the past, in any effort related to "wishing makes it better" (an, "if this had been different" philosophy), but progress, as forward thinking movement, which captivates, and expounds upon all understanding of one's past, whilst keeping eyes on the prize.  You're always stronger for any effort, and better letting it go.  This is evolution, evolving, growing with your experience, not as repetition of understanding through apples to apples comparison, but as through an effort of compare and contrast.

Hindsight is 20/20 and Foresight is Visionary

So, rather than pulling information forward, one thought from the next; we allow for retention, and growth according to possibility.  Opposition, brings breadth of knowledge and understanding of concept ... one never knows what relevance might surface, which would play at opposition to an ideal.  This method, provides one with possibility for exception, and greater likelihood for innovation, through open-minded optimism, and advanced skills toward decision-based proclivity. 

Hindsight, is 20/20;
the big picture is providence.

  

Finally. 

Where do we find color in our lives.  Color surfaces, and then we are drawn.  Regularly, we are asked to deliver color, we are asked to imagine objects with intensity of a specific color, or to place color in the absence of color.  Regularly, we are asked to shed light on our values according to color.  Color is enlightenment.

Primary

Color has an edge.  We see color, through immediacy.  In the moment, a color gives purpose; we understand need, based upon a value of strength we've ascribed to any given color.  We look to maturity to ascribe color.  Primary colors, were first.  Primary colors we learned to love, first.  A melting pot of wax, on a kindergarten playground.  Primary colors:  red, yellow, blue, and green... distinct and clear, each giving rise to the question of personality, according to 'best'... which works best, which one is your choice?  Primary red is color, saturated; red is depth, red demands, red is either complete absorption, or it is suffused... red bleeds; just how far will or can one go, 'prior to' a request?  Red answers.  Red is depth, of concern:  it is passionate; red is depth, of ability:  it is firm; red is strict.  Red IS primary. 

Blue, is expanse.  Blue is where we breathe.  Blue is light as air, deep as an ocean, dark as midnight; blue brings space, opens our minds, stretches our horizon.  It is, as far as the eye can see;  it is, open... blue is infinite and forever; blue seeks warmth.

Green is the color of beginning.  Green is new, green is awake, green is fresh as life:  green thrives, or it dies. 

Yellow sparks interest.  It sparkles, and plays on one's mind.  Yellow ignites, brightens, is sharp, has value and adds light.  We desire light in our lives, we search for a bright future.  Yellow refracts light.  Yellow is vivid in its subtlety.  

Visuals (blue is... red saturates... yellow refracts... green grows) .... we see color; we experience color through one mode of understanding.  Color is significant, and color is visual.

Color is diversity.

Finally

Color delivers potential.  We look to color as clarification; a defined edge for mobility.  A permanent, well-designed structure, will have determined, and very distinct boundaries for management.  Color provides clarity.  As brokers, we have learned that basic bland, is the potential for broadest attraction; I, instead, look to design, and to marketing by location in the quest for marketed potential, and to best performance of management style, to qualify best suit for any given real estate project.  Color qualifies a market.  I look to green.

In business, we are asked to qualify our markets; in the business of real estate, green qualified, decides financial wherewithal, or alternatively determines financial insufficiency... of an investor.  In the business of real estate (defined as "real property"), green qualification, should determine a bright green future for the structure, first, for the community at large, in conjunction, and for cash on cash investment ROI (an investor's outlay), as a deliverable, through positive growth for any given project.  Green strategies, return green dollars.  Green property strategies, require a building's, or structure's, or project's, market according to health.  A structure's health, leads to community viability.  Green strategies, green management principles, should be applied to the building's structure, and to performance potential, not to an investor's wallet.  We, as realtors, as real estate professionals, should look to preservation, strength and integrity of these brick and mortar structural 'bodies' in discovering objectivity for our professional endeavors. 

Green

Green is our understanding of preservation.  In science, green is all colors, but green... it ingests.  Green lives, and green promotes life.  Green should be a strategy of least change, a closer to home advantage.  To market green, means to use less, means to custom-fit your strategy, and to customize your processes.  Understand your work.  Are you an apprentice, in need of guidance, or are you a professional, able to meld into your market?  If you need of direction, in order to determine your structural marketplace, and in deciding your best green path, a mentor, one well-versed in technology, social networks, and adherence to those networks for acquisition of market enthusiasm, will promote energy toward the project, whilst providing an introduction to social technology.  These networks, are new green, in real estate.  Mostly unused, in procuring a preservationist's best market, and so, should be a best use resource for branding and identifying your space within the chain of command, and in delivering a web persona to your professional identity.

Green is the color of envy.  Entice your market. 

... and finally, color.

  

Whilst searching for college options for a high school poet, one may find opportunity to learn new definitions of technique... while you might understand where you need be in order to light your path, accounting for obstacles of alternative method, is necessity.  How do you analyze a situation, in order to reach a pre-determined destination? 

Through attributes of formula, a characterization of elements; your prescribed "notions" through your own personal chemistry of organized thought.

"Two roads diverged... "  We understand phrases, words in motion, as distinct for the situation.  A personal/internal comprehension, allows circumstance to take heed; so, although we may interpret phrasing internally through self-dialog, we might understand another's point of view, externally, as auditory white noise (static).  An environmental perception, one which demonstrates placement as a point to point measurement of distance between where you sit, and your distant point of view, should allow for definitive placement of these two characterizations of thought, yours, as opposed to any and all others.  "Two roads diverged.... " under these circumstances of comprehension, the road less traveled, the road I'm on, is the shortest distance to travel, but not necessarily the shortest distance between two points.

You find occasion gives you pause, I discovered a blip on my path, giving rise to the notion that, while one might have a solid awareness of a particular formula of thought, which allows absolute understanding of one's own destiny, another's process may enlighten your understanding of concept; I anguish over approach... my way, is to adapt, to simplify, to progress via positive communication.  I endure, but allow only for superficial interest from others; so, through the context of passionate response, I discovered that all positive effort has value, even without disposition.  Three concepts for review of purpose were presented to me by a dedication of life:  these were insight, relevant to success; immediacy, transparency, approachability...  approachability being a divergent concept for me. 

Immediacy and Transparency,  invites Approachability
To approach, to be assured access; to gain acceptance.  According to a life defined by purpose, approachability allows for humanity.  Systems designed for approachability, entice response... I exhibit reluctance.  This other 'border-less' philosophy for orderliness 'assumes' approachability, a natural appeal in kind, and encourages responsibility.  The difference I bring is in expectation; while one may exude responsibility through process, a process rooted in personal strength, I require and expect independence.  So, in other words, I demand performance on a personal level without exception.  An approachable characteristic will decide success with exception, and thus may deliver strength, integrity, responsibility, allowing for aptitude.  I believe this is a quality, befitting intuitive leadership.


Two Roads Diverged
A point to point measurement, your distant point of view; perspective has an angle, and a reason.  You decide a course, determine a footprint, and now, I'll account for the occasional abstract interruption... and the opportunity to view another impression.  Not according to the road I'm on, but as the view from where I've been.


For a glimpse of genius, and review toward your own abstracted interruption:  Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey at Webster University, September 18, 2009

  

Check this out: snurl.com/rpten   [bx_businessweek_com]… &, with the return of Mr. Jobs to his rightful position as creative superior of secure technology, with ‘app’eal, let’s compare the only 2 contenders for business-level service that truly make sense.

Blackberry, offers a variety of handset sizes, a tactile, fine-motor delineation, for its users.  Consideration given to keyboard preference, are you an old-school, two-finger typist?  A “big picture” thinker, one who can see the forest, but never even looks for the trees?  A full-sized QWERTY keyboard is a God-send for you, so one of the larger Blackberry models; or do you, like myself, prefer a small-screen for portability, style, and simplified use.  A no-frills app-less approach.  Less is more, is my style, and I prefer the Pearl, for such a tool.  

Currently, however, I’m on the iPhone’s system…

Apple’s unique touchscreen system was introduced as a smartphone alternative… your go everywhere, be everything you need it to be, device.  An app for every interest, a unified connection to anything, in every way, while on the go.  The catch for me, is in keyboard function…a performance delay by way of touchscreen sensitivity, I find the indecisiveness of the onscreen keyboard, burdensome.  The iPhone is a brilliant mobility tool, and used in conjunction with Apple’s system, all things are possible, and customizable.  

Blackberry vs. iPhone… in a perfect world, they’re perfect; and, here’s my one solution to app overload:  snurl.com/rqfgn   [www_viigo_com].

  

Once upon a time, there was an educational idea. 

One that delivered an approach to living an economic of priority, as best evaluated by a system of proverbial snake oil.... or deceptive deals, as prescribed by definition through real estate's "funnel" marketing approach to sales.  We, as realtors, were taught "highest and best value IS the best-use" as sales philosophy, in the creation of personal gain through monetary wealth, both for the sales professional, as well as for the investor.  This technique attempted to justify a philosophy of "the best deal" is the ultimate goal, and is a deal in which your customer, or friend, or relative, or any purchaser/investor using your services in the acquisition of a business structure, stands to "win" by profit, or "cash value" .... this stands to reason, that a building or structure by location, under such an economic mechanism as this, should be understood as only "sufficient" use for purposes of evaluation according to the theory of "highest and best use" or for an economy of supply and demand.  Our, meaning a career-minded community of brokerage, "our" success is currently driven by a network or community of friends or acquaintances, a broker's "sphere of influence," as it were, with each one's success, as denoted by dollars achieved or achievable in any given transaction, or in the aggregate at year's end ... we would BETTER serve the interests of these people, as well would we better serve our communities of structural integrity, should we acknowledge our level of interest as being in the business of real estate, or as simply being in the business of creating wealth through cash.  So, in the alternative then,

... should we decide our interests lie with the business side of this profession, we should look to preservation of location, and evaluate structural adhesion to a community through a screen of highest and best use (as was presumably intended, though ill-defined through educational tracks), and then should look to location for performance, then to best purpose for the structure as it stands (this is preservation/conservation) in the desire to maintain heritage.  This is the point of a true dedication to maintaining the health and well-being of our homes and lifestyles, and thus our cities and businesses.  It is the responsibility of every broker, developer, community or business leader, to understand these two very distinct tactics, and then to decide upon a correct course of action, according to personal integrity.

My approach is one of strict performance... our understanding of local history, flavors of our past... what makes this place, Denver, special ... every location, all points of interest for lifestyles of culture, have definitive personality traits, characterizations of class denoted by local interpretation.  We should look to these points of interest, and to local cultures of art, art being the advantage, as we develop our market, and manage corporate relationships.  A best use philosophy, suggests providing advantageous benefit for all concerned, with priority being upon structural development.  Business synergy is then provided and maintained, as a professional courtesy. 

A best use philosophy dictates the need to require business-level advice, for benefit of structural performance and trendless market validity.  Every relationship is a worthwhile endeavor, and every business has its value.  Its best value, is through the realization of its qualified differences, and then in the particular marketing ONLY to those set to benefit from those qualified differences.  The key, then, to developed business synergy, is in location-based work flow, and in qualified placement according to the scope of each individual proprietor or business owner's objective, these being the qualifiable differences in question. 

What is the business goal?  Where does the primary business concern surface, and how does that one clear business objective fit the schema, and then fit the developed business climate.  This, should be rendered through the understanding that one should qualify these points via direct communication with the primary decision-maker for the business, and with the understanding that this one individual might require a different perspective, in order to understand best use within the market or community.  A best use scenario requires willingness to provide these understandings for best direction, and the conviction to realize best suit, should the need to refer business elsewhere, better suit a situation for best intentions of the structure.

Structural integrity in an environment of historic preservation, being the key element for prescribed best use in all situations. 

These are sound practices for business development and for relationship value, as a value-added proposition, and for continued customer relationship management. 

... the beginning of a beautiful friendship... a fairytale indeed.